Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Polaris Powerled Technologies, LLC v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al, No. 2:22-cv-00469 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 12, 2024)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:22-cv-00469, Dkt. No. 375
Decided
December 12, 2024
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re 341 MOTION for Supplemental Claim Construction for USP 7,259,521 filed by SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., Samsung Display Co., Ltd. (Motion(s)341 terminated)
Length
4 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendants Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., and Samsung Display Co., Ltd.’s (collectively, “Samsung”) Motion for Supplemental Claim Construction for U.S. Patent No. 7,259,521 (the “Motion”). (Dkt. No. 341.) Having considered the Motion and related briefing, the Court finds that it should be and hereby is DENIED. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Polaris PowerLED Technologies, LLC (“Polaris”) filed this lawsuit on December 12, 2022, accusing Samsung of infringing U.S. Patent No.