Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Polaris Powerled Technologies, LLC v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al, No. 2:22-cv-00469 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 21, 2024)

Granted
Discovery Daubert / Expert Challenges
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:22-cv-00469, Dkt. No. 357
Decided
November 21, 2024
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re 254. Having considered the Motion and related briefing, the Court finds that it should be and hereby is GRANTED
Length
6 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Plaintiff Polaris PowerLED Technologies, LLC’s (“Plaintiff”) Opposed Motion for Leave to Serve August 12, 2024, Supplemental Expert Report of Richard Flasck (the “Motion”). (Dkt. No. 254.) Having considered the Motion and related briefing, the Court finds that it should be and hereby is GRANTED. I. BACKGROUND On December 12, 2022, Plaintiff filed a complaint for patent infringement against Defendants Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., and Samsung Display Co., Ltd. (collectively, “Defendants”). (Dkt. No.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case