Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Polaris Powerled Technologies, LLC v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al, No. 2:22-cv-00469 (E.D. Tex. June 14, 2024)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:22-cv-00469, Dkt. No. 171
Decided
June 14, 2024
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Order
Length
31 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

In this patent case, Polaris PowerLED T echnologies, LLC (“Polaris”) alleges infringement by Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and various affiliates (together, “Samsung”) of U.S. Patent No. 7,259,521 (the “’521 Patent”), U.S. Patent No. 8,217,887 (the “’887 Patent”), and U.S. Patent No. 8,740,456 (the “’456 Patent”). The ’521 Patent and the ’887 Patent relate to electronic displays. See ’521 Patent at 1:6–9 (“The invention relates . . .