Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Polaris Powerled Technologies, LLC v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al, No. 2:22-cv-00469 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 3, 2024)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:22-cv-00469, Dkt. No. 364
Decided
December 3, 2024
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re 340 MOTION to Sever MOTION to Stay Proceedings as to US Patent 7,259,521 filed by SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., Samsung Display Co., Ltd.. (Motion(s)340 terminated)
Length
6 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Renewed Motion to Sever and Stay Proceedings as to U.S. Patent No. 7,259,521 (the “Motion”) filed by Defendants Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., and Samsung Display Co., Ltd. (collectively, “Samsung”). (Dkt. No. 340.) In the Motion, Samsung renews its request that the Court sever and stay proceedings related to U.S. Patent No.