Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. v. Taasera Licensing LLC et al, No. 2:22-cv-00314 (E.D. Tex. July 22, 2022)

Granted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:22-cv-00314, Dkt. No. 79
Decided
July 22, 2022
Judge
Edgardo Ramos, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER: granting 75 Letter Motion to Seal. The defendant Taasera Licensing LLC's request for permission to file under seal an unredacted version of its reply in support of its motion to dismiss is GRANTED. IT IS SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge …
Length
2 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

July 21, 2022 VIA ECF The H onorable Judge Edgardo Ramos United States District Judge United States District Court for the Southern District of New York 500 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007 RE: Pal o Alto Networks, Inc. v. Taasera Licensing LLC and Quest Patent Research Corporation Case No. 1:22-cv-02306-ER/SDA (S.D.N.Y.) Dear J udge Ramos: We repr esent Defendant Taasera Licensing LLC (“Defendant”) in the above -referenced matter. Pursuant to Your Honor’s Individual Practice Rule 3.ii.