Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. v. Taasera Licensing LLC et al, No. 2:22-cv-00314 (E.D. Tex. June 1, 2022)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:22-cv-00314, Dkt. No. 37
Decided
June 1, 2022
Judge
See opinion
Document
Order
Docket Entry
MEMO ENDORSED ORDER denying without prejudice 25 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. ENDORSEMENT: Defendant Quest Patent Research Corporation's motion to dismiss, Doc. 25, is denied without prejudice. Defendant is directed to file a…
Length
2 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK PALO ALTO NETWORKS, INC., Plaintiff, v. TAASERA LICENSING LLC and QUEST PATENT RESEARCH CORPORATION, Defendants. Case No. 1:22-cv-02306-ER NOTICE OF MOTION ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, upon the accompanying Memorandum of Law in Support of Defendant Quest Patent Research Corporation’s Motion to Dismiss Palo Alto Networks, Inc.’s (“Palo Alto” or “Plaintiff”) First Amended Complaint (D.I.