Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. v. Taasera Licensing LLC et al, No. 2:22-cv-00314 (E.D. Tex. June 24, 2022)

Granted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:22-cv-00314, Dkt. No. 62
Decided
June 24, 2022
Judge
Edgardo Ramos, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER: granting 47 Letter Motion to Seal. The defendant Quest Patent Research Corporation's request for permission to file under seal an unredacted version of its motion to dismiss, supporting memorandum of law, and supporting declaration i…
Length
2 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Tarter Krinsky & Drogin LLP 1350 Broadway New York, NY 10018 P 212.216.8000 F 212.216.8001 www.tarterkrinsky.com Mark J. Rosenberg Partner 212-216-1127 mrosenberg@tarterkrinsky.com June 23, 2022 Via ECF Hon. Edgardo Ramos United States District Court Southern District of New York 40 Foley Square New York, NY 10007 Re: Palo Alto Networks, Inc. v. Taasera Licensing LLC and Quest Patent Research Corporation, No.