Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. v. Taasera Licensing LLC et al, No. 2:22-cv-00314 (E.D. Tex. June 1, 2022)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:22-cv-00314, Dkt. No. 38
Decided
June 1, 2022
Judge
See opinion
Document
Order
Docket Entry
MEMO ENDORSED ORDER denying without prejudice 32 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. ENDORSEMENT: Defendant Taasera Licensing LLC's motion to dismiss, Doc. 32, is denied without prejudice. Defendant is directed to file a letter requ…
Length
2 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Alfred R. Fabricant FABRICANT LLP 411 Theodore Fremd Avenue, Suite 206 South Rye, New York 10580 Tel. (212) 257-5797 Fax (212) 257-5796 ffabricant@fabricantllp.com Att orneys for Defendant Taasera Licensing LLC UNITE D STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK PALO ALTO NETWORKS, INC., Plaintiff, v. TAASERA LICENSING LLC and QUEST PATENT RESEARCH CORPORATION, Defendants. Case No.