Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. v. Taasera Licensing LLC et al, No. 2:22-cv-00314 (E.D. Tex. July 22, 2022)

Granted
Sealing / Protective Order
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:22-cv-00314, Dkt. No. 78
Decided
July 22, 2022
Judge
Edgardo Ramos, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER: granting 70 Letter Motion to Seal. The defendant Quest Patent Research Corporation's request for permission to file under seal an unredacted version of its reply in support of its motion to dismiss is GRANTED. IT IS SO ORDERED. (Sign…
Length
2 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Tarter Krinsky & Drogin LLP 1350 Broadway New York, NY 10018 P 212.216.8000 F 212.216.8001 www.tarterkrinsky.com Mark J. Rosenberg Partner 212-216-1127 mrosenberg@tarterkrinsky.com Via ECF July 21, 2022 The Honorable Edgardo Ramos, U.S.D.J. United States District Court, S.D.N.Y. 40 Foley Square New York, NY 10007 Re: Palo Alto Networks, Inc. v. Taasera Licensing LLC and Quest Patent Research Corporation, No.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case