Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

G+ Communications, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al, No. 2:22-cv-00078 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 12, 2024)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:22-cv-00078, Dkt. No. 626
Decided
April 12, 2024
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - denying 614
Length
3 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendants Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc.’s (collectively, “Defendants” or “Samsung”) Motion Regarding Preliminary Jury Instructions in New Damages Trial (the “Motion”). (Dkt. No. 614) . In the Motion, Samsung requests that “the preliminary and final jury instructions given in the New Damages Trail should focus solely on the issue in dispute (damages) and not discuss the prior trial or any jury findings (e.g., that the ’776 and ’130 patents were found to be ‘infringed’ or ‘valid’).” (Id. at 1).