Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

G+ Communications, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al, No. 2:22-cv-00078 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 28, 2022)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:22-cv-00078, Dkt. No. 41
Decided
September 28, 2022
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re 26 MOTION to Dismiss Defendants' Counterclaim (Count 1) filed by G+ Communications, LLC
Length
6 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Plaintiff G+ Communications, LLC’s (“G+”) Motion to Dismiss Defendants’ Counterclaim (Count I) (the “Motion”). (Dkt. No. 26). In the same, G+ moves to dismiss Defendants Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd and Samsung Electronics America, Inc.’s (collectively, “Samsung”) breach of contract counterclaim regarding FRAND (“Counterclaim I”) alleging that: (1) Samsung failed to plead factual allegations sufficient to demonstrate a breach of the FRAND obligation; (2) Samsung failed to plead factual allegation…