G+ Communications, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al, No. 2:22-cv-00078 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 12, 2024)
From the Opinion
The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.
Before the Court is Plaintiff G+ Communications, LLC’s (“G+” or “Plaintiff”) Motion to Enforce Issue and Claim Preclusion that G+ Damages Request Does Not Violate Frand and to Preclude Introduction of Settlement Offers (the “Motion”). (Dkt. No. 612) . In the Motion, G+ requests that at the damages re -trial set to begin on April 15, 2024, the Court should prohibit Samsung from: (1) “Arguing that G+’s damages request violates FRAND;” (2) “Introducing the terms of G+’s settlement offers;” and (3) “Alleging that a FRA…
Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error