Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

G+ Communications, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al, No. 2:22-cv-00078 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 12, 2024)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:22-cv-00078, Dkt. No. 625
Decided
April 12, 2024
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - denying 612
Length
10 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Plaintiff G+ Communications, LLC’s (“G+” or “Plaintiff”) Motion to Enforce Issue and Claim Preclusion that G+ Damages Request Does Not Violate Frand and to Preclude Introduction of Settlement Offers (the “Motion”). (Dkt. No. 612) . In the Motion, G+ requests that at the damages re -trial set to begin on April 15, 2024, the Court should prohibit Samsung from: (1) “Arguing that G+’s damages request violates FRAND;” (2) “Introducing the terms of G+’s settlement offers;” and (3) “Alleging that a FRA…