Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Finesse Wireless LLC v. AT&T Mobility LLC, No. 2:21-cv-00316 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 29, 2023)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:21-cv-00316, Dkt. No. 339
Decided
August 29, 2023
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re 296 MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law regarding Damages filed by Nokia of America Corporation
Length
16 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendants’ Rule 50(b) Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law regarding Damages (the “Motion”). (Dkt. No. 296.) In it , Defendant AT&T Mobility, LLC (“AT&T”) and Intervenor -Defendant Nokia of America Corporation (“Nokia”) (collectively, “Defendants”) move for judgement as a matter of law (“JMOL”) on damages. (Id. at 1.) Plaintiff Finesse Wireless LLC (“Finesse”) opposes the Motion. (See Dkt. No. 310 at 1.) For the following reasons, the Court finds that the Motion should be DENIED. II.