Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Finesse Wireless LLC v. AT&T Mobility LLC, No. 2:21-cv-00316 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 21, 2022)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:21-cv-00316, Dkt. No. 240
Decided
December 21, 2022
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Length
27 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are five motions to strike and one motion to supplement . Plaintiff Finesse Wireless, LLC filed three of the motions to strike: (1) Motion to Exclude Late-Produced Evidence and to Strike Certain Opinions of Defendants' Damages Expert Dr. Becker (Dkt. No. 129); (2) Motion to Strike and Exclude References, Opinion, and Argument Relating to Ericsson's Dismissal (Dkt. No. 130); and (3) Motion to Strike Expert Disclosure and Exclude Testimony of Arnaud Pierrard (Dkt. No. 131).