Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Finesse Wireless LLC v. AT&T Mobility LLC, No. 2:21-cv-00316 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 5, 2023)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:21-cv-00316, Dkt. No. 253
Decided
January 5, 2023
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 241 Report and Recommendations,,
Length
2 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before th e C ourt are three motions for summary judgment filed by Defendant AT&T Mobility, LLC and Intervenor Defendant Nokia of America Corporation (together, “Defendants”): (1) Motion for Summary Judgment for Non-Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 9,548,775 (Dkt. No. 134); (2) Motion for Summary Judgment for Non-Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,346,134 (Dkt. No. 135); and (3) Motion fo r Su mmary Judgment for Invalidity of the ’775 Patent Asserted Claims (Dkt. No. 136).