Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Finesse Wireless LLC v. AT&T Mobility LLC, No. 2:21-cv-00316 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 29, 2023)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:21-cv-00316, Dkt. No. 338
Decided
August 29, 2023
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re 295 MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law regarding Invalidity filed by Nokia of America Corporation
Length
5 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendants’ 50(b) Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law Regarding Invalidity (“the Motion”). (Dkt. No. 295.) In it Defendant AT&T Mobility, LLC (“AT&T”) and Intervenor-Defendant Nokia of America Corporation (“Nokia”) (collectively, “Defendants”) move the Court to enter judgment as a matter of law under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 50(b) that the patents asserted at trial are invalid. For the following reasons, the Court DENIES the Motion. II. BACKGROUND At trial, Defendants’ presented evidence through its expert, Mr.