Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Finesse Wireless LLC v. AT&T Mobility LLC, No. 2:21-cv-00316 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 21, 2022)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:21-cv-00316, Dkt. No. 241
Decided
December 21, 2022
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Report and Recommendation
Docket Entry
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 135 SEALED MOTION for Summary Judgment for Non-Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,346,134 filed by Nokia of America Corporation, 136 SEALED MOTION DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT FOR INVALIDITY OF THE 77…
Length
32 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are three motions for summary judgment (Dkt. Nos. 134, 135, 136) filed by Intervenor -Defendant Nokia of America Corporation . The motions include (1) Motion for Summary Judgment of Non- infringement of U.S. Patent No. 9,548,775 (Dkt. No. 134), (2) Motion for Summary Judgment for Non- infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,346,134 (Dkt. No. 135), and (3) Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity of U.S. Patent No. 9,548,775 (Dkt. No. 136). For the following reasons, the motions for summary judgment should be DENIED. I.