Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Optis Wireless Technology, LLC et al v. Huawei Device (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd, No. 2:17-cv-00123 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 15, 2019)

Granted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:17-cv-00123, Dkt. No. 409
Decided
November 15, 2019
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
***VACATED PER ORDER 422***MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
Length
9 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Plaintiffs Optis Wireless Technology, LLC; PanOptis Patent Management, LLC; and Optis Cellular Technology, LLC’s (collectively, “PanOptis”) Motion for Exceptional Case Status and Attorney Fees (the “Motion”). (Dkt. No. 376.) Having considered the briefing, case record, and relevant authorities the Court is of the opinion the Motion should be GRANTED for the reasons set forth herein. I. BACKGROUND PanOptis sued Defendants Huawei Device USA, Inc. and Huawei Device (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.