Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Optis Wireless Technology, LLC et al v. Huawei Device (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd, No. 2:17-cv-00123 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 18, 2019)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:17-cv-00123, Dkt. No. 373
Decided
March 18, 2019
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
Length
16 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION OPTIS WIRELESS TECHNOLOGY, LLC, PANOPTIS PATENT MANAGEMENT, LLC, OPTIS CELLULAR TECHNOLOGY, LLC., Pla intiffs, v. HUAW EI DEVICE USA, INC., HUAWEI DEVICE (SHENZHEN) CO., LTD., Def endants. § § § § § § § § § § § § § § CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:17-CV-00123-JRG MEMORANDUM OPINION AND FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW I. INTRODUCTION This case concerns the licensing of standard essential patents in the telecommunications industry.