Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Optis Wireless Technology, LLC et al v. Huawei Device (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd, No. 2:17-cv-00123 (E.D. Tex. July 11, 2018)

Adopted in Part Report and recommendation adopted with modification
Motion to Strike Summary Judgment Motion to Dismiss
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:17-cv-00123, Dkt. No. 214
Decided
July 11, 2018
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION, ORDER, AND RECOMMENDATION re 141 SEALED PATENT MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT THAT THE ASSERTED CLAIMS OF THE 216 PATENT ARE NOT INFRINGED filed by Huawei Device USA, Inc., Huawei Device Co. Ltd., 145 MOTION to Dismiss for …
Length
17 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

, AND RECOMMENDATION This is a patent infringement lawsuit involving six patents that the plaintiffs (referred to as “PanOptis” for short) allege are infringed by Huawei. PanOptis bought the patents from Ericsson and Panasonic after they had declared them essential to the L.T.E., or Long -Term Evolution, cellular standard. PanOptis alleges that Huawei infringes these patents by making, selling, and importing phones and tablets that are compatible with the L.T.E. standard. Trial is scheduled to start August 20, 2018.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case