Optis Wireless Technology, LLC et al v. Huawei Device (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd, No. 2:17-cv-00123 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 18, 2018)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

On December 1, 2017, the Court held an oral hearing to determine the proper construction of the disputed claim terms in the following U.S. Patents Nos. 6,604,216 (the “’216 Patent”), 7,769,238 (the “’238 Patent”), 7,940,851 (the “’851 Patent”), 8,358,284 (the “’284 Patent”), and 8,437,293 (the “’293 Patent”). The Court has considered the parties’ claim construction briefing (Dkt. Nos. 94, 101, and 102) and arguments. Based on the intrinsic and extrinsic evidence, the Court construes the disputed terms in this Memorandum and Order. See Phillips v.