Optis Wireless Technology, LLC et al v. Huawei Device (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd, No. 2:17-cv-00123 (E.D. Tex. May 15, 2018)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the court is the report and recommendation of Magistrate Judge Payne , which recommends that Plaintiffs’ motion for an anti-suit injunction be denied without prejudice. ECF No. 137. For dispositive matters referred to a magistrate judge, the district court must “determine de novo any part of the magistrate judge’s disposition that has been properly objected to.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). “The district judge may accept, reject, or modify the recommend disposition.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C).