Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Raytheon Company v. Cray, Inc., No. 2:15-cv-01554 (E.D. Tex. July 18, 2017)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:15-cv-01554, Dkt. No. 313
Decided
July 18, 2017
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
SUPPLEMENTAL CLAIM CONSTRUCTION MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Length
11 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

The Court previously held a claim construction hearing and entered a Claim Construction Memorandum and Order. (See Dkt. Nos. 78 & 263.) At a hearing on July 12, 2017, on Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Amend its Infringement Contentions (Dkt. No. 230), the Court ordered supplemental claim construction briefing to address an apparent claim construction dispute. (See Dkt. No. 302, July 12, 2017 Hr’g Tr.) Now before the Court are Plaintiff Raytheon Company’s (“Plaintiff’s” or “Raytheon’s”) Brief Regarding “Motherboard” and “Card” (Dkt. No.