Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Raytheon Company v. Cray, Inc., No. 2:15-cv-01554 (E.D. Tex. June 19, 2017)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:15-cv-01554, Dkt. No. 273
Decided
June 19, 2017
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER 109 SEALED MOTION TO COMPEL 30(b)(6) DEPOSITION TESTIMONY ON TOPICS 40 AND 41, AND TO COMPEL DOCUMENT PRODUCTION filed by Cray, Inc
Length
7 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Cray’s Motion to Compel 30(b)(6) Testimony [Dkt. # 109] is before the Court. In the Motion, Cray moves the Court to compel Raytheon to (1) provide corporate testimony about two topics in Cray’s Rule 30(b)(6) notice to Raytheon; (2) produce documents re- garding Silicon Graphics, Inc.’s 2007 offer to purchase the asserted patents; and (3) pro- duce documents identifying the architecture, features, and revenue from a system Ray- theon sold to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).