Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Raytheon Company v. Cray, Inc., No. 2:15-cv-01554 (E.D. Tex. June 29, 2017)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:15-cv-01554, Dkt. No. 289
Decided
June 29, 2017
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
27 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Motion of Defendant Cray, Inc. (“Cray”) to Transfer Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a). (Dkt. No. 256.) Having considered the Parties’ submissions and the relevant authorities, and for the following reasons, the Court finds that the motion should be and is DENIED. I. BACKGROUND On September 25, 2015, Raytheon Company (“Raytheon”) filed its Complaint against Cray, Inc., alleging infringement of four patents. (Dkt. No.