Raytheon Company v. Cray, Inc., No. 2:15-cv-01554 (E.D. Tex. June 6, 2017)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Cray’s Motion to Compel 30(b)(6) Testimony [Dkt. # 105] is before the Court. Ini- tially, Cray moved the Court to compel Raytheon to designate a witness with knowledge of certain topics identified in Cray’s September 2016 Rule 30(b)(6) notice. Cray later nar- rowed the scope of relief it finds sufficient to 30(b)(6) testimony on one topic: Why cer- tain Cray systems were not disclosed to the USPTO during prosecution of the asserted patents. Hr’g Tr. (Feb. 9, 2017) 45:6–11.