Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Raytheon Company v. Cray, Inc., No. 2:15-cv-01554 (E.D. Tex. June 5, 2017)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:15-cv-01554, Dkt. No. 259
Decided
June 5, 2017
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Order
Length
5 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Cray, Inc. moves the Court to compel the production of certain documents from Raytheon Company based on Raytheon’s purported waiver of attorney -client privilege. Cray’s Motion [Dkt. # 108]. After considering the parties’ briefing and arguments of counsel made during a February 2017 hearing, the Court DENIES the motion. I. BACKGROUND As part of its responses to Cray’s discovery requests, Raytheon produced three in- vention disclosure questionnaires for the patents asserted in this litigation. Kohm Decl. [Dkt. # 108-1] ¶ 2.