Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

PerdiemCo, LLC. v. Industrack LLC, No. 2:15-cv-00727 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 10, 2016)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:15-cv-00727, Dkt. No. 303
Decided
November 10, 2016
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Report and Recommendation
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 272 Report and Recommendations denying 174 Motion for Summary Judgment
Length
1 page

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation filed by Magistrate Judge Payne (Dkt. No. 272) recommending denial of Defendant Geotab’s Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity (Dkt. No. 174). Having considered the Objections filed by Geotab (Dkt. No. 301) and finding them to be without sufficient merit, the Recommendation is adopted. IT IS ORDERED that the Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 174) is DENIED.