Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

PerdiemCo, LLC. v. Industrack LLC, No. 2:15-cv-00727 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 29, 2016)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:15-cv-00727, Dkt. No. 238
Decided
September 29, 2016
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 233 Report and Recommendations,
Length
1 page

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Payne (Dkt. No. 233) concluding that Defenda nts’ Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings that the Asserted Patents Claim Ineligible Subject Matter under 35 U.S.C. § 101 (Dkt. 62) and Defendants’ Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings that the Claims of the Asserted Patents are Invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 112 ¶¶ 1 and 2 (Dk t. 66) should both be den ied.