PerdiemCo, LLC. v. Industrack LLC, No. 2:15-cv-00727 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 29, 2016)
From the Opinion
The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.
Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Payne (Dkt. No. 233) concluding that Defenda nts’ Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings that the Asserted Patents Claim Ineligible Subject Matter under 35 U.S.C. § 101 (Dkt. 62) and Defendants’ Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings that the Claims of the Asserted Patents are Invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 112 ¶¶ 1 and 2 (Dk t. 66) should both be den ied.
Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error