Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

PerdiemCo, LLC. v. Industrack LLC, No. 2:15-cv-00727 (E.D. Tex. July 7, 2016)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:15-cv-00727, Dkt. No. 155
Decided
July 7, 2016
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Order
Length
95 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

On April 21, 2016, the Court held a hearing to determine the proper construction of disputed claim terms in United States Patents No. 8,223,012, 8,493,207, 8,717,166, 9,033,499, and 9,071,931. Having reviewed the arguments made by the parties at the hearing and in the parties’ claim construction briefing (Dkt. Nos. 86, 91, and 94), 1 having considered the intrinsic evidence, and having made subsidiary factual fi ndings about the extrinsic evidence, the Court hereby issues this Claim Construction Memorandum and Order. See Phillips v. AWH Corp.