PerdiemCo, LLC. v. Industrack LLC, No. 2:15-cv-00727 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 9, 2016)
From the Opinion
The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.
Before the Court is the Motion to Exclude Certain Opinions of Geotab’s Damages Expert Michael Tate (Dkt. No. 175, “PerDiem’s Motion” ) filed by Plaintiff PerDiemCo, LLC (“PerDiem”) and the Motion to Exclude Testimony of Plaintiff's Expert on Damages (Dkt. No. 179) (“Geotab’s Motion”) filed by Defendant s Geotab Inc. and Geotab USA, Inc. (“Geotab”). For the following reasons, the Court is of the opinion that PerDiem’s Motion should be DENIED and Geotab’s Motion should also be DENIED.
Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error