Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

PerdiemCo, LLC. v. Industrack LLC, No. 2:15-cv-00727 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 31, 2016)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:15-cv-00727, Dkt. No. 274
Decided
October 31, 2016
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
7 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

PerDiem moved in limine to preclude Geotab from presenting evidence or argument that relates to or undermines the Court’s Claim Construction Order. Dkt. 231 at 1. The Court granted PerDiem’s motion, see Dkt. 250 at 2, but because of the nature of the issue, the Court ordered supplemental briefing regarding specific examples of evidence or argument that could implicate claim construction , see id.