Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Mobile Telecommunications Technologies, LLC v. Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC, No. 2:13-cv-00259 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 10, 2015)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:13-cv-00259, Dkt. No. 132
Decided
September 10, 2015
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Length
9 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

This case arises from Mobile Telecommunications Te chnologies, LLC’s (“MTel”) claim that Samsung Telecommunications America, Inc. infringed two patents owned by MTel. After a four-day trial, the jury found that Samsung did not infringe the asserted patents. (Doc. No. 107.) Pending before the Court is MTel’s Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law Regarding Infringement and Alternative Motion for New Trial. (Doc. No. 126.) I. JUDGEMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW OR NEW TRIAL A. APPLICABLE LAW “No later than 28 days after the entry of judgment . . .