Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Mobile Telecommunications Technologies, LLC v. Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC, No. 2:13-cv-00259 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 11, 2014)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:13-cv-00259, Dkt. No. 82
Decided
December 11, 2014
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Length
1 page

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is MTEL’s Motion for Reli ef from Exclusion Order (Dkt. 69, the “Motion”). MTEL asks this Court to permit introduction of the “NFR” document that it failed to timely disclose. For the reasons set forth in th e Court’s prior rulings on this issue, MTEL’s request is DENIED. (10/20 Tr. at 41:1-21; 11/7 Tr. at 50 :18-21.) The Court notes, however, that it may revisit its ruling if Samsung opens the door to the topic. (See, e.g., 11/7 Tr.