Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Mobile Telecommunications Technologies, LLC v. Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC, No. 2:13-cv-00259 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 13, 2014)

Granted in Part
Daubert / Expert Challenges Discovery
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:13-cv-00259, Dkt. No. 95
Decided
December 13, 2014
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER re 67 Remaining Objections to Samsung's Deposition Designations
Length
3 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is MTEL’s Objecti ons to Deposition Testimony Designated by Samsung. MTEL objects to the deposition testimony on a number of grounds, the most salient of which is that the objected-to testimony of invent ors is improper expert testimony rather than fact testimony as Samsung alleges. The Court makes the below rulings keeping in mind the fact that there is no way to draw a clear line on when a inventor testimony is simple factual testimony as opposed to when it becomes expert testimony.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case