Mobile Telecommunications Technologies, LLC v. Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC, No. 2:13-cv-00259 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 11, 2014)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is MTEL’s Emergency Mo tion for Claim Construction (Dkt. 51, the “Motion”). MTEL asks the Court to construe the term “retransmission.” MTEL’s motion is prompted by the Court’s ruling in the parallel Apple case, which was consolidated with this case for pretrial proceedings, includ ing claim construction. In the Apple case, defendant Apple filed a motion for summary judgment and contended that the Court was required to weigh in on the meaning of the te rm “retransmission.” (Case. No. 2:12-cv-832, Dkt.