Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Mobile Telecommunications Technologies, LLC v. Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC, No. 2:13-cv-00259 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 13, 2014)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:13-cv-00259, Dkt. No. 94
Decided
December 13, 2014
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
ORDER denying 62 Motion for Summary Judgment re: Issue Preclusion
Length
3 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Samsung’s Motion for Su mmary Judgment of Non-Infringement on the Basis of Issue Preclusion (Dkt. 62, the “M otion”). Samsung asks for summary judgment based on the jury’s verdict of non-infri ngement of the ‘506 Patent in the Mobile Telecommunications Technologies, LLC’s v. Apple, Inc. case, which is Case No. 2:13-cv-258- JRG-RSP on this Court’s docket (“Apple case”). An eloquent summary of issue preclusion was authored by Justice Harlan in the landmark case of Southern P. R. Co. v. United States, 168 U.S.