First American CoreLogic, Inc. v. Fiserv, Inc. et al, No. 2:10-cv-00132 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 30, 2013)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are Plaintiff’s Renewed Motion For Judgment As A Matter Of Law That Interthinx Infringes Claims 1 And 10 of U.S. Patent No. 5,361,201 (Dkt. No. 465) and Plaintiff’s Motion For A New Trial (Dkt. No. 466). APPLICABLE LAW A. Judgment as a Matter of Law Judgment as a matter of law is appropriate “[ i]f a party has been fully heard on an issue during a jury trial and the court finds that a re asonable jury would not ha ve a legally sufficient evidentiary basis to find for the party on that issue . . . .” Fed. R. Civ. P. 50(a) & (b).