Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

First American CoreLogic, Inc. v. Fiserv, Inc. et al, No. 2:10-cv-00132 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 2, 2010)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:10-cv-00132, Dkt. No. 98
Decided
December 2, 2010
Judge
See opinion
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER - the Court, having considered the motions and the arguments of counsel, DENIES CoreLogics Motion for Protective Order (Dkt. No. 75.) and DENIES CoreLogic's, Opposed Motion to Reclaim Certain Privileged Document…
Length
12 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are the Motion for Protective Order by First American CoreLogic, Inc. (“CoreLogic”) (Dkt. No. 75) and CoreLogic‟s Opposed Motion to Reclaim Certain Privileged Documents Filed Under Seal and Submitting for In Camera Review. (Dkt. No. 86.) The Court, having considered the motions and the arguments of counsel, DENIES CoreLogic‟s Motion for Protective Order (Dkt. No. 75.) and DENIES Cor eLogic‟s Opposed Motion to Reclaim Certain Privileged Documents. (Dkt. No. 86.) 2 II.