Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

First American CoreLogic, Inc. v. Fiserv, Inc. et al, No. 2:10-cv-00132 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 23, 2012)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:10-cv-00132, Dkt. No. 428
Decided
September 23, 2012
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
ORDER denying in part 347 CoreLogic's Motions in Limine Nos. 4, 5 and 6; granting in part and denying in part 349 Defendants' Motions in Limine Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6 and 8
Length
2 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are Plaintiff CoreLogi c Information Solutions, Inc.’s Motions in Limine (Dkt No. 347, filed August 20, 2012) and Defendants’ Motions in Limine (Dkt. No. 349, filed August 20, 2012). The Court heard argument on se veral of the motions during the pretrial hearing held on September 6, 2012. See Pretrial Hr’g Tr., Dkt. No. 404. On September 20, 2012, the Court issued a ruling on a number of the motions. See Dkt. No. 411. This order addresses the remaining motions.