First American CoreLogic, Inc. v. Fiserv, Inc. et al, No. 2:10-cv-00132 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 13, 2012)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Plaintiff CoreLogic Info rmation Solutions, Inc.’s Motion to Strike Defendants’ Amended Supplemental Invalidity Contentions (Dkt. No. 287). The Court heard argument on the motion at the pretrial c onference held on September 6, 2012. Having considered the briefing and arguments of the parties, CoreLogic’s motion is GRANTED. APPLICABLE LAW The Court’s Rules of Practice for Patent Ca ses require the parties to disclose their invalidity contentions relati vely early in the case. See P.R. 3.3.