Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

First American CoreLogic, Inc. v. Fiserv, Inc. et al, No. 2:10-cv-00132 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 21, 2012)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:10-cv-00132, Dkt. No. 420
Decided
September 21, 2012
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
***DUPLICATE ORDER PLEASE IGNORE ***CLAIM CONSTRUCTION MEMORANDUM AND ORDER and CONCLUSION
Length
21 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

On March 7, 2012, the Court held a hearing to determine the proper construction of the disputed claim terms in U.S. Patent No. 5,361,201. After considering the arguments made by the parties at the hearing and in the parties’ cl aim construction briefing (Dkt. Nos. 213, 220, and 225), the Court issues this Claim Construction Memorandum and Order. APPLICABLE LAW A. Claim Construction “It is a ‘bedrock principle’ of patent law that ‘the claims of a patent define the invention to which the patentee is enti tled the right to exclude.’” Phillips v. AWH Corp.