Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Tinnus Enterprises, LLC et al v. Telebrands Corporation, No. 6:16-cv-00033 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 15, 2019)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:16-cv-00033, Dkt. No. 725
Decided
March 15, 2019
Judge
Robert W. Schroeder, III, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
REDACTED VERSION OF 719 SEALED MEMORANDUM AND OPINION
Length
64 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are the parties’ motions for post-trial relief. Having considered the parties’ written submissions and the arguments at the April 18, 2018 hear ing, the Court rules as follows:  Plaintiffs’ Motion for Enhanced Damages under 35 U.S.C. § 284 (Docket No. 578) is GRANTED;  Plaintiffs’ Motion for Apportionment of Damages as to Retailer Defendants (Docket No. 579) is DENIED;  Plaintiffs’ Motion for a Permanent Injunction (Docket No. 580) is GRANTED;  Plaintiffs’ Motion for Prejudgment and Post -judgment Interest (Docket No.