Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Tinnus Enterprises, LLC et al v. Telebrands Corporation, No. 6:16-cv-00033 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 1, 2017)

Denied
Damages
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:16-cv-00033, Dkt. No. 485
Decided
November 1, 2017
Judge
Robert W. Schroeder, III, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. The Court DENIES the ZURU entities' and Plaintiffs' Motions to Reconsider (Docket Nos. Docket Nos. 422, 423, 424, 425). Plaintiffs' same objections to the Magistrate Judge's Order (Docket No. 428) are OVERRULED
Length
14 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Plaintiffs Tinnus Enterprises, LLC and ZURU Ltd.’s (“Plaintiffs”) Motion to Reconsider (Docket Nos. 423 (sealed), 425) and ZURU Inc., ZURU L LC, ZURU Pty Ltd., and ZURU UK Ltd.’s (“ZURU entities”) Motion to Reconsider (Docket Nos. 422 (sealed), 424). Defendants Telebrands Corporation and Bulbhead.com, LLC (“Defendants”) filed a response (Docket No. 435), to which Plaintiffs filed a reply (Docket No. 451), and Defendants filed a sur-reply. Docket No. 465. On October 25, 2017, the Court held an evidentiary hearing on the matter.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case