Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Tinnus Enterprises, LLC et al v. Telebrands Corporation, No. 6:16-cv-00033 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 11, 2017)

Granted in Part
Motion to Strike Daubert / Expert Challenges
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:16-cv-00033, Dkt. No. 384
Decided
August 11, 2017
Judge
See opinion
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER. The Court GRANTS-IN-PART 329 Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike. Paragraphs 34 through 50 and 56 through 66 of Dr. Kamrin's rebuttal expert report are hereby STRICKEN. Within 14 days of the issue of this Order, Dr. K…
Length
10 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are two related motions to strike the expert reports of Plaintiffs’ expert, Dr. Kudrowitz (Doc. No. 331), and Defendants’ expert, Dr. Kamrin (Doc. No. 329). The motions have been fully briefed. (Doc. Nos. 329, 331, 361, 362, 376, 378.) BACKGROUND On January 26, 2016 , Plaintiffs filed the instant action against Telebrands, alleging infringement of U.S. Patent No. 9,242,749 (“the ’749 Patent”). (Doc. No. 1.) On April 19, 2016, Plaintiffs amended their complaint to add allegations of infringement of U.S. Patent No.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case