Tinnus Enterprises, LLC et al v. Telebrands Corporation, No. 6:16-cv-00033 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 11, 2017)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendants’ Telebrands Corporation and Bulbhead.com LLC (collectively “Defendants”) Motion to Exclude Plaintiffs’ expert Alan Ratliff’s Opinion on Lost Profits, including price erosion. (Doc. No. 335.) Plaintiffs Tinnus Enterprises, LLC and ZURU Ltd. (collectively “Plaintiffs”) filed a response (Doc. No. 366), to which Defendants filed a reply (Doc. No. 379), and Plaintiffs filed a sur-reply (Doc. No. 388). On September 7, 2017, the Court held a hearing. For the reasons stated herein, Defendants’ Motion (Doc. No.