Chrimar Systems, Inc. et al v. Adtran, Inc., No. 6:15-cv-00618 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 13, 2017)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendants ADTRAN, Inc., Accton T echnology, Corp., EdgeCore USA Corp., D-Link Systems, Inc., and TRENDnet International Inc.’s (collectively “Defendants” or “remaining Defendants”) Emergency Motion for Summary Judgment of Non -Infringement on Claims Tried in the Aerohive Trial and All Remaining Claims (Dkt. No. 788 , “Mot.”). Having carefully considered Defendants’ arguments, the Court is persuaded that the doctrine of issue preclusion does not bar Chrimar ’s infringement claims against Defendants.