Chrimar Systems, Inc. et al v. Adtran, Inc., No. 6:15-cv-00618 (E.D. Tex. July 29, 2016)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defe ndants’1 Motion to Stay Pending Inter Partes Review (Doc. No. 457). Plaintiffs Chrimar Systems, Inc. and Chrimar Holding Company, LLC (“Chrimar”) filed a response (Doc. No. 489), to which Defendants filed a reply (Doc. No. 497) . Having considered the parties’ arguments and for the reasons set forth below, Defendants’ Motion to Stay (Doc. No. 457) is DENIED. BACKGROUND On July 1, 2015, Chrimar filed its original complaint against Defendants alleging infringement of four of Chrimar’s patents. 2 (6:15-cv-639, Doc No. 1.