Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Chrimar Systems, Inc. et al v. Adtran, Inc., No. 6:15-cv-00618 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 11, 2016)

Granted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:15-cv-00618, Dkt. No. 231
Decided
January 11, 2016
Judge
John D. Love, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER transferring Consolidated Civil Action 6:15cv630 to the Northern District of California
Length
14 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant Juniper Networks, Inc.’s (“Juniper”) Motion to Transfer Venue Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1404(a). (Doc. No. 19. ) Plaintiffs Chrimar Systems, Inc. and Chrimar Holding Company, LLC (“Chrimar”) filed a response (Doc. No. 20 ) to which Juniper filed a reply (Doc. No. 22), and Chrimar filed a sur-reply (Doc. No. 23). Upon consideration of the parties’ arguments, the Court GRANTS Juniper’s Motion to Transfer Venue (Doc. No. 19). BACKGROUND Chrimar Systems Inc.