Chrimar Systems, Inc. et al v. Alcatel-Lucent S.A. et al, No. 6:15-cv-00163 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 21, 2020)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant Alcatel-Lucent Enterprises USA, Inc. (“ALE”) Motion to Declare this Case Exceptional and For Attorney’s Fees. (Doc. No. 494.) Plaintiffs Chrimar Systems, Inc. d/b/a CMS Technologies and Chrimar Holding Company LLC (“Chrimar”) have filed a response (Doc. No. 497), to which ALE has filed a reply (Doc. No. 500), and Chrimar has filed a sur-reply (Doc. No. 503). For the reasons stated herein, the Court DENIES ALE’s Motion (Doc. No. 494). BACKGROUND On March 9, 2015, Plaintiffs filed the instant action against Defendant ALE.